In order to get more accurate results, our search has the following Google-Type search functionality:
If you use '+' in front of a word, then that word will be present in the search results.
ex: Harry +Potter will return results with the word 'Potter'.
If you use '-' in front of a word, then that word will be absent in the search results.
ex: Harry -Potter will return results without the word 'Potter'.
If you use 'AND' between two words, then both of those words will be present in the search results.
ex: Harry AND Potter will return results with both 'Harry' and 'Potter'.
If you use 'OR' between two words, then bth of those words may or may not be present in the search results.
ex: Harry OR Potter will return results with just 'Harry', results with just 'Potter' and results with both 'Harry' and 'Potter'.
If you use 'NOT' before a word, then that word will be absent in the search results.
ex: Harry NOT Potter will return results without the word 'Potter'.
Placing '""' around words will perform a phrase search. The search results will contain those words in that order.
ex: "Harry Potter" will return any results with 'Harry Potter' in them, but not 'Potter Harry'.
Using '*' in a word will perform a wildcard search. The '*' signifies any number of characters. Searches can not start with a wildcard.
ex: Pot*er will return results with words starting with 'Pot' and ending in 'er'. In this case, 'Potter' will be a match.
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
OverviewAndrew Stewart and George Williams, leading scholars and media commentators, explain what has been called the most important decision of the Australian High Court since the Tasmanian Dam Case in 1983. They show what was being argued and why it was being argued, as well as what was decided and the implications for Australia's future. They include key passages of the majority judgment, and from the dissents of Justices Kirby and Callinan. Is this a destabilising intrusion of direct federal lawmaking into areas of legislation which, since federation, have been the subjects of State laws (Justice Kirby)? Might it reduce State Parliaments to impotent debating societies (Justice Callinan)? Full Product DetailsAuthor: Andrew Stewart , George WilliamsPublisher: Federation Press Imprint: Federation Press Dimensions: Width: 13.50cm , Height: 1.30cm , Length: 20.80cm Weight: 0.250kg ISBN: 9781862876422ISBN 10: 1862876428 Pages: 200 Publication Date: 15 January 2007 Audience: College/higher education , Professional and scholarly , Tertiary & Higher Education , Professional & Vocational Format: Paperback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: Available  This item will be ordered in for you from one of our suppliers. Upon receipt, we will promptly dispatch it out to you. Table of ContentsPart I - Background Introduction Australia's Federal System Labour Relations and the Constitution The Work Choices Legislation The Constitutional Challenge Part II - The Decision Interpreting the Constitution The Scope of the Corporations Power The Relationship Between the Corporations Power and the Industrial Arbitration Power Excluding State Laws Making Law Through Regulations Other Issues Part III - The Implications What it Means for Labour Relations What it Means for the Federation Extracts from the Australian ConstitutionSelect BibliographyIndexReviewsThe background chapters provide an excellent overview of the historical limits of federal power read into the Constitution through successive High Court decisions. This would be particularly useful for academics, students and practitioners of law and industrial relations...Of interest to many readers will be the analysis of the judges on the High Court, and the book provides commentaries on carefully selected extracts from the judgements on key issues raised in the case. - Labour & Industry, Vol 18 No 2, December 2007 Author InformationTab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |
||||
| Your cart is empty |  |
Log In
Register/Sign Up
Customer Log In